Training
ML/dictionary/training
Definition
The expensive one-time process of running a learning algorithm over data until the models parameters settle into useful values. Frontier-model training costs $100M+ and tens of thousands of GPUs.
Posts that use this term
- Troubleshooting local LLMs (and how to keep up after this series)
The full catalog of local-LLM failures: OOM, slow tok/s, garbage output, instruction drift, bad RAG hits, tool-call hallucination. Plus where to follow the field once you're on your own.
- Fine-tuning a model locally
When fine-tuning is actually the right call (it usually isn't) and how to pull off a LoRA run on a 16GB Mac, with a worked Llama 3.2 3B example.
- Local RAG and embeddings
Build a working local RAG pipeline in about 30 lines using nomic-embed-text, Chroma, and Llama 3.2. And why running it on your own machine beats the cloud for personal notes.
- Wiring a local LLM into the tools you already use
How to point VS Code (Continue, Cline), web chat UIs (Open WebUI, LibreChat, Page Assist), and your own code at a local model using the OpenAI-compatible API. Swap cloud for local without rewriting anything.
- Picking a local model by task
The 2026 open leaders, sorted by what you actually want to do: coding, chat, the small-model crowd, structured output, vision, embeddings, and audio.
- Quantization, distillation, pruning: how a 140GB model fits on your laptop
Three ways to shrink an LLM, and why one of them does almost all the work. What Q4_K_M actually means and what each shortcut costs you.
- The pitch for local LLMs in 2026
The case for running an LLM on the machine you already own. Privacy, no per-call cost, faster first token, no rate limits, and it works on a flight.
- What leaves your machine when you use AI
What providers actually see, log, and keep when you call an LLM API in 2026. What "we don't train on your data" really means, how free and paid tiers differ, and when local is the only safe choice.
- The runtimes: llama.cpp, Ollama, LM Studio
llama.cpp is the engine. Ollama and LM Studio wrap it. What each one does, when to reach for which, and why the OpenAI-compatible APIs are mostly but not entirely interchangeable.
- Why Apple Silicon punches above its weight on local LLMs
Unified memory lets the GPU see all of RAM. Here's why that beats a discrete-GPU PC past 32B parameters, what fits in 16/32/64/128/192GB, and where Apple Silicon still loses.
- Prompt, RAG, fine-tune: three ways to shape a model
Three levers for shaping what an LLM does: prompting (ask better), RAG (give it the right context), fine-tuning (change the weights). What each costs, what each fixes, and how to pick.
- RAG: giving a model memory it doesn't have
RAG is the pattern of fetching relevant text from a search system and putting it in the LLM's context window before asking your question. Not magic, not fine-tuning, just better prompts.
- The context window, and why models hallucinate
An LLM only sees a fixed-size slice of text at a time. When it doesn't know something, it predicts anyway. That's a hallucination, not a bug.
- From models to LLMs
An LLM is one kind of ML model, trained on text, predicts the next token. That single trick at scale gets you ChatGPT, and also explains where it breaks.
- How a model learns: training and inference
Training is the expensive one-time event where a model's numbers get tuned. Inference is the cheap repeated use afterwards. The gap in cost is enormous, and it shapes the whole industry.
- What makes a model: data and algorithm
A model is a file of learned numbers, produced by running an algorithm over data. Both ingredients matter, but bad data beats a good algorithm every time.
- Inside AI: machine learning and deep learning
Open the AI umbrella. Machine learning is the part that learns from data. Deep learning is ML done with neural networks, and that's where today's models live.